No Great Mystery of "Judicial Tyranny"


By Anna Von Reitz

There is no “great mystery of judicial tyranny”.  There is only a great deal of fustian ignorance and assumption abounding.
The Constitution exists to set up the Federal Government and the Federal Government is responsible for nineteen delegated “powers” — duties to perform services in common for the subscribing states of the union—- all of which, with the limited exception of the Interstate Commerce Clause— take place in the international jurisdiction of the sea.  
As a result the only courts created under The Constitution are Admiralty, Maritime, and Administrative Courts related to the Federal Government and its duties. 
Those courts were never meant to say a single word to us, the actual people.  They were pressed into service when the United States of America, Inc. was fraudulently bankrupted in 1933.  Suddenly, there was no funding for our long-established Common Law Courts. 
So the rats got around this by committing a vast crime of personage and “redefining” us and naming Foreign Situs Trusts and Cestui Que Vie Trusts after us.  These were then incorporated entities that they could address in Admiralty/Maritime and Administrative courts.
[The crime of personage amounts to a form of identity theft and involves deliberately confusing a living man with an incorporated entity named after him.]
They bankrupted the Foreign Situs Trusts as presumed sureties of the United States of America, Inc. at the same time that they started charging off current services provided by the UNITED STATES, INC. against the Cestui Que Vie Trusts. 
Thus their Trustees had their hands in the pockets of “John Michael Doe” Foreign Situs Trust at the same time as the current service provider had their paws in the pockets of “JOHN MICHAEL DOE” —— neither name any longer representing the actual living man
This is a commercial crime of staggering proportions, but it is not a political issue.  It is, as I keep telling you, a commercial crime with political consequences. 
Wake up and smell the java. 
—————————–
See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.  
Advertisements

8 thoughts on “No Great Mystery of "Judicial Tyranny"

  1. BobbyC

    no matter who you say you are “oath of office” “shackles” all public servants to the constitution as Jefferson said, and we need only go after oath to succeed in any court!!!! all this “Hooey” need not even enter the conversation!!! Period

    Reply
  2. Unknown

    Listen everyone to Anna, listen and do, for it is the doers of the word that will stay out of jail, for they are obedient. So which ground will you be? Stoney, Sand or Building on a solid rock. For where the Spirit of the Lord is there is freedom, not bondage. LISTEN AND DO PERIOD!

    Reply
  3. Mike V

    How was “United States of America Inc. a corporation” set up ? Not under the Constitution?
    Hell is not a single layered structure, imagine every brick in the pyramid as a single compartmentalized entity. This system is Masonic in nature many degrees of understanding , it was created with their understanding of it not to draw you a simple picture of the prison cell they created that would be manifest bar by bar over time far after any personal repercussions could be felt.

    “”Vice-admiralty courts commissioned 'by the'king exercised jurisdiction over maritime cases in the colonies prior to the Declaration of Independence, but this jurisdiction was delegated to the federal courts when the Union was established, the Consti-
    tution of the United States providing that, “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases,..-of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction.” Therefore the admiralty law of the United States is administered by the federal' courts uniformly throughout the
    nation as a distinct, independent legal system. “”

    “”A federal statute provides, “The laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law, in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply;”and, in construing this statute, the Supreme Court of the United States has said, “Except in matters governed by the Federal Constitution or by acts of Congress, the law to be applied in any case is the law of the state.,….And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon the federal courts.”Therefore, the initial phrase of the statute, “The laws of the several States,” refers to both the statutory and decisional laws of the States, and “there is no federal general common law.” “”
    [ Handbook of Elementary Law – Walter Smith, Sec. Ed.-1939 ]

    So in a nut-shell the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction in admiralty/maritime matters and the states have jurisdiction over common law matters. So your status as a federal citizen puts you under federal jurisdiction and Admiralty law, and which is foreign to the States common law.
    US citizen = federal employee/agent sailing in the sea of commerce, their jurisdiction follows you into every court and that status is in Admiralty.

    Reply
  4. mtman2

    And YET the Left-Wingnuts just don't catch on, mocking as they march i to eternity lime lemmings laughing at what should scare the be-Jesus right out of them.
    Scripture is readily abailable and no intellectual thinker of even the recent past would feel well rounded without a good handle on Bible knowledge.

    Reply
  5. AirCarvings

    Article two courts are for federal “United States” business. Exparte vs Milligan. The deal with things concerning United States business like United States Citizens. Still they are not to tromple all over on the people upon the land, nor meddle with them if the people have their common law courts and counties up and running. Again exparte vs Milligan, easy to find in a few seconds and reads highlights this.

    Reply
  6. penny4yerthoughts

    Judicial sections of the Federal and State Constitutions. It does not say specifically those terms, admiralty etc, but courts legislated by Congress which are statute/code based for the PERSON, State Registered Organizations, which lack Constitutional Capacity and Authority, whereas the Supreme Courts of federal and state are the judicial courts ONLY that have jurisdiction/common law for (wo)man. We constantly give them jurisdiction by not knowing or understanding who exactly we are, what capacity we are in, public or private, and creating controversy from the getgo.

    Reply
  7. penny4yerthoughts

    Matthew VII:1-2 Judge not, that ye be not judged. for with what judgement ye judge, yee shall be judged; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you againe. (KJV 1611)

    Revelation 13:8-16-17-18 (KJV 1611)

    8 And all the dwel vpon the earth, shall worship him, whose names are not written in the booke of life of the Lambe, slaine from the foundation of the world:
    16 And he causeth all, both smal and great, rich and poore, free and bond, to receiue a marke in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    17 And that no man might buy or sell, saue he that had the marke, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name:
    18 Here is wisedome. Let him that hath vnderstanding, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is sixe hundred threescore and sixe.

    Revelation 14:11 (KJV 1611) – And the smoke of their torment ascendeth vp for euer. And they haue no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoeuer receyueth the marke of his name.

    Reply
  8. Courts of Record

    You stated: “As a result the only courts created under The Constitution are Admiralty, Maritime, and Administrative Courts related to the Federal Government and its duties.” These courts are not mentioned in the Constitution. Where is the documentation that they were created under the Constitution? They were created to be sure but they were not set up under the Constitution. They were set up under United States of America Inc. a corporation. They are mere child corporations under a major corporation. And they certainly have no limited powers as evidence by how they consistently rape the People.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s